Supreme court rulings on gay marriage

Home / identity relationships / Supreme court rulings on gay marriage

"We realized we need to get married before the new administration comes in, because we don't know what kind of shenanigans are going to come in with marriage equality,” Tribbey told the NorthJersey.com, which is a part of the USA TODAY Network

Such concerns are on the minds of many as Pride Month 2025 gets underway.

Hodges in an appeal filed on July 24 about the compensation she was ordered to pay a couple after denying them a marriage license.

Mat Staver, head of Liberty Counsel, the conservative legal group representing Davis, said that decision threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman.

"The High Court now has the opportunity to finally overturn this egregious opinion from 2015," Staver said in a statement.

More: He was at the center of a Supreme Court case that changed gay marriage.

supreme court rulings on gay marriage

Hodges. Wade was in 2022?

"I think there may be a try," Winslow-Majette said. By waiting so long to raise this argument,” they said, “Davis deprived” them, as well as the lower courts, “of a fair opportunity to address it.”

Second, Moore and Ermold continued, Davis had waived her right to challenge Obergefell, because she “‘expressly stated that she did not “want[] to relitigate the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell.”’” “The Court should hold her to that representation,” the men wrote.

In deciding whether to grant a particular petition for review, the justices take a variety of factors into account.

"The politics have simply moved on from same-sex marriage, even for conservative religious people."

Geoffrey R. Stone, who teaches law at the University of Chicago, agreed the court is unlikely to scrap Obergefell despite its willingness in recent years to overturn precedents on abortion and affirmative action.

While a majority of the current justices may disagree with Obergefell, the decision is generally approved by the public, he said.

More: From marginal religious groups to mainstream Christians, there's a shift in Supreme Court cases

"For that reason, and to avoid the appearance of interpreting the Constitution in a manner that conforms to their own personal views," Stone said in an emailed response, "even some of the conservative justices might not vote to overrule Obergefell."

Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v.

They want to make the case a judgment on Obergefell itself. There was no hurry.

Then came Election Day: Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2024. Instead, she merely contends that it “was wrong when it was decided and it is wrong today.”

Whether the court will grant review really boils down to whether there are four votes to take up the question.

After the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell, Kentucky’s governor at the time, Steve Beshear, sent a letter to the clerks in all of the state’s counties, directing them to “license and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples.”

Although a county attorney told Davis that she would be required to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, Davis opted instead to stop issuing marriage licenses to anyone – gay or straight.

"Based on things we've heard the Supreme Court say in the past, I think they're going after anything that's not traditional. Have that in order. Her job description included issuing licenses – such as marriage licenses – to county residents. 13, 2025, 1:19 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/08/will-the-supreme-court-revisit-its-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/

Supreme Court rejects challenge to landmark same-sex marriage decision

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Nov.

10 decided not to revisit its landmark ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, leaving undisturbed a decade-old decision that some conservative justices oppose but that LGBTQ+ couples have relied on to legalize their relationships and create families.

The court rejected an appeal from Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk who drew international attention when she refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses despite the 2015 decision, Obergefell v.

The justices could act on Davis’ petition for review as soon as Nov. 10. They met online in 2020 (one lived in Pennsylvania, the other in Arizona), met in person in 2022 and by December they were a couple. It would be easier, they reasoned, for the government to prevent their marriage than to un-marry them after the fact.

Still it was hard, Tribbey said, to have to suddenly alter their life plans, and to stage a hurried wedding without the preferred trappings, and without most of their respective families.

So did the 2022 Dobbs decision overturning the constitutional right to abortion. I didn't just want a shoebox to be married in."

Perhaps, he said, they can have a more elaborate re-commitment ceremony in 2030 or so, when all of this has blown over. Now, he's worried.

But there has not been the same kind of conservative movement to take back marriage rights for same-sex couples as there was to get rid of the constitutional right to an abortion.

There are an estimated 823,000 married same-sex couples in the United States, more than double the number in 2015, according to the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, a think tank that researches sexual orientation and gender identity issues.

"There’s good reason for the Supreme Court to deny review in this case rather than unsettle something so positive for couples, children, families, and the larger society as marriage equality," Mary Bonauto, a senior director with LGBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, said when Davis filed her appeal.

More: Justice Alito still doesn't like court's gay marriage decision but said it's precedent

Davis made headlines when she refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples after the Supreme Court's 2015 decision, landing her in jail for five days on a contempt of court charge.

When Davis was sued by David Ermold and David Moore, she argued that legal protections that provide immunity for public officials prevented the challenge.